Search: concept

it's "xwiki-core specific", no it's ok since we already have multiwiki concept in wiki macro

xwiki concept. But yes, it's already there so it's fine vmassol - (16:37): sdumitriu: still the

it's "xwiki-core specific", no it's ok since we already have multiwiki concept in wiki macro

xwiki concept. But yes, it's already there so it's fine vmassol - (16:37): sdumitriu: still the

> yeah. it's a very nice concept 11:02 <jstoldt> just like tide turbines 11:03 <@cjdelisle> Also you have

load calculations tell just how much. 11:05 <jstoldt> well, for me personally the best concept for

> yeah. it's a very nice concept 11:02 <jstoldt> just like tide turbines 11:03 <@cjdelisle> Also you have

load calculations tell just how much. 11:05 <jstoldt> well, for me personally the best concept for

"page renamed" event 11:51 <jstoldt> to be honest, i don't like the concept of add new, remove old to

"page renamed" event 11:51 <jstoldt> to be honest, i don't like the concept of add new, remove old to

the design of workspaces) 17:27 <JuanDaugherty> I meant the concept with the URL I just gave, not

proof of concept 11:43 <vmassol> ok good 11:43 <vmassol> thanks 11:46 <pturcotte> has quit 12:11

the administration app) just for the proof of concept 11:43 <vmassol> ok good 11:43 <vmassol> thanks

commons sense, when a project contains too much concept you separate it is several like we do all the time

commons sense, when a project contains too much concept you separate it is several like we do all the time

<jstoldt> proof of concept? 10:16 <@cjdelisle> Because mine doesn't rely on asking verisign who owns a

<jstoldt> proof of concept? 10:16 <@cjdelisle> Because mine doesn't rely on asking verisign who owns a

/expansable/expendable/ 22:16 <mar3lis> i'm not sure i understand the concept of this method 22:16 <+Denis> if

/expansable/expendable/ 22:16 <mar3lis> i'm not sure i understand the concept of this method 22:16 <+Denis> if

- (14:18): lucaa: it is, the concept is the same vmassol - (14:18): ask ciprian I'm sure he'll tell you he copied the concept from the current xwiki sas ologo tmortagne - (14:18): IMO 15 is way too close

one, the concept is different vmassol - (14:19): very different vmassol - (14:19): in our case it

- (14:18): lucaa: it is, the concept is the same vmassol - (14:18): ask ciprian I'm sure he'll tell you he copied the concept from the current xwiki sas ologo tmortagne - (14:18): IMO 15 is way too close

one, the concept is different vmassol - (14:19): very different vmassol - (14:19): in our case it

, it's the concept of "title" temporalfox - (16:08): there is no possiblity today to define a title for

temporalfox - (16:11): today there is no first class concept of that in wiki syntax temporalfox - (16:12): it

, it's the concept of "title" temporalfox - (16:08): there is no possiblity today to define a title for

temporalfox - (16:11): today there is no first class concept of that in wiki syntax temporalfox - (16:12): it