=$doc.getUrl()?refreshed=1" />{{/html}}#end{{/velocity cjdelisle - (00:05): there's a proof of concept for meta

it's "xwiki-core specific", no it's ok since we already have multiwiki concept in wiki macro

xwiki concept. But yes, it's already there so it's fine vmassol - (16:37): sdumitriu: still the

it's "xwiki-core specific", no it's ok since we already have multiwiki concept in wiki macro

xwiki concept. But yes, it's already there so it's fine vmassol - (16:37): sdumitriu: still the

> yeah. it's a very nice concept 11:02 <jstoldt> just like tide turbines 11:03 <@cjdelisle> Also you have

load calculations tell just how much. 11:05 <jstoldt> well, for me personally the best concept for

> yeah. it's a very nice concept 11:02 <jstoldt> just like tide turbines 11:03 <@cjdelisle> Also you have

load calculations tell just how much. 11:05 <jstoldt> well, for me personally the best concept for

commons sense, when a project contains too much concept you separate it is several like we do all the time

commons sense, when a project contains too much concept you separate it is several like we do all the time

<+tmortagne> we could find a way to make include macro a bit less dependent on wiki concept, like some API to

that concept... in fact, i am still trying to figure out a good translation for mill that makes sense

`> *concept 14:49 <cjdelisle> inside of that you have a space called Another. 14:49 <cjdelisle> Inside of that

that concept... in fact, i am still trying to figure out a good translation for mill that makes sense

<+sburjan`> *concept 14:49 <cjdelisle> inside of that you have a space called Another. 14:49 <cjdelisle

component concept 14:29 <+lucaa> yes, I had written this wrapper already, for this very purpose, to provide

component concept 14:29 <+lucaa> yes, I had written this wrapper already, for this very purpose, to provide

<jstoldt> proof of concept? 10:16 <@cjdelisle> Because mine doesn't rely on asking verisign who owns a

<jstoldt> proof of concept? 10:16 <@cjdelisle> Because mine doesn't rely on asking verisign who owns a

maven right? 17:16 <+tmortagne> there is no concept of category in maven anyway 17:16 <+tmortagne

maven right? 17:16 <+tmortagne> there is no concept of category in maven anyway 17:16 <+tmortagne

to be able to create tables ofc 22:39 <+sburjan`> oracle has another concept of database as it seems