Search: concept

<tmortagne> we don't really have a current namespace concept, there is the namespace for the current wiki

<tmortagne> we don't really have a current namespace concept, there is the namespace for the current wiki

> Invoice1, Invoice2 15:53 <vmassol> Client 2 > Invoice1 15:54 <vmassol> also don't forget the concept of

must explain the nested concept to my boss 15:57 <vmassol> but it won't be simpler at all 15:58

> Invoice1, Invoice2 15:53 <vmassol> Client 2 > Invoice1 15:54 <vmassol> also don't forget the concept of

must explain the nested concept to my boss 15:57 <vmassol> but it won't be simpler at all 15:58

ProtectedBlock concept apparently 18:54 <mflorea1> code macro works fine 18:54 <vmassol> and the icon tx respect

with the code macro and then closed it as won't fix since I introduced the concept of

ProtectedBlock concept apparently 18:54 <mflorea1> code macro works fine 18:54 <vmassol> and the icon tx respect

with the code macro and then closed it as won't fix since I introduced the concept of

<tmortagne> evalica: the concept of bundled extension does not really exist in XWiki Repository, it's a

<tmortagne> evalica: the concept of bundled extension does not really exist in XWiki Repository, it's a

space concept should be hidden in the UI normally 11:55 <vmassol> Enygma`: the alternative is to

<vmassol> if we say that the wiki concept is core then I guess we should also have it in the core so that

space concept should be hidden in the UI normally 11:55 <vmassol> Enygma`: the alternative is to

<vmassol> if we say that the wiki concept is core then I guess we should also have it in the core so that

just a small Proof of Concept anamariastoica - (30/03/2009 17:10): / http://code.google.com/apis

just a small Proof of Concept anamariastoica - (30/03/2009 17:10): / http://code.google.com/apis

communication ;) 13:46 <vmassol> tmortagne: ok 13:46 <vmassol> thanks 13:46 <vmassol> too bad that this concept

if some title is badly displayed 14:05 <vmassol> the alternative is to remove the concept of "works

tick 14:07 <vmassol> to indicate it "works" iwth XE 6.0.1 14:07 <vmassol> but the concept is fuzzy 14

communication ;) 13:46 <vmassol> tmortagne: ok 13:46 <vmassol> thanks 13:46 <vmassol> too bad that this concept

if some title is badly displayed 14:05 <vmassol> the alternative is to remove the concept of "works

tick 14:07 <vmassol> to indicate it "works" iwth XE 6.0.1 14:07 <vmassol> but the concept is fuzzy 14

use it 14:37 <tmortagne> anyway import thing is that the concept already exist and just need to check

use it 14:37 <tmortagne> anyway import thing is that the concept already exist and just need to check

page… seems we have blow up some concept too fast ! 10:20 <vmassol> IMO that's a mistake, we shouldn't be able to administer a non existing page 10:20 <vmassol> I don't see any issue of concept though 10

page… seems we have blow up some concept too fast ! 10:20 <vmassol> IMO that's a mistake, we shouldn't be able to administer a non existing page 10:20 <vmassol> I don't see any issue of concept though 10

that this new concept of Rendering Context is new 10:46 <vmassol> still new 10:46 <vmassol> but not for

that this new concept of Rendering Context is new 10:46 <vmassol> still new 10:46 <vmassol> but not for