:31): cjdelisle: basically all I would need is a single page showing proof of concept for this; I do

lpereira1 left at 00:44 (Quit: Leaving. abusenius left at 01:17 (Ping timeout: 260 seconds CalebJamesDeLisl - (01:39): tsziklay, here is some information about scripting in general http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/DevGuide/Scripting CalebJamesDeLisl - (01:40): If you just need proof of concept all you

lpereira1 left at 00:44 (Quit: Leaving. abusenius left at 01:17 (Ping timeout: 260 seconds CalebJamesDeLisl - (01:39): tsziklay, here is some information about scripting in general http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/DevGuide/Scripting CalebJamesDeLisl - (01:40): If you just need proof of concept all you

silly to let a user sign something without knowing it. cjdelisle - (12:07): takes away the concept of

silly to let a user sign something without knowing it. cjdelisle - (12:07): takes away the concept of

velocity, i never liked the fact that theses macro depends on this concept at rendering level abusenius

velocity, i never liked the fact that theses macro depends on this concept at rendering level abusenius

now is that the existing dashboard proof of concept doesn't work anymore lucaa - (15:52): and all it

): because what happens right now is that the existing dashboard proof of concept doesn't work anymore lucaa

, sure. I was just pleasantly surprised by the concept of special cases :) tmortagne - (16:02): lucaa

variable informations that's scripting macros even if he does not seems to understand the concept of

variable informations that's scripting macros even if he does not seems to understand the concept of

triggered this. 17:02 <tmortagne> if these events are going to manipulate different concept then I guess the

triggered this. 17:02 <tmortagne> if these events are going to manipulate different concept then I guess the

> it's a technical name 19:00 <vmassol> technical concept 19:00 <vmassol> which is fine for a macro 19:00

for the concept ;) 19:10 <vmassol> changing the name is an impl detail that's not too hard 19:11

<vmassol> :) 19:13 <tmortagne> title concept is technical ? 19:13 <vmassol> seeing

> it's a technical name 19:00 <vmassol> technical concept 19:00 <vmassol> which is fine for a macro 19:00

for the concept ;) 19:10 <vmassol> changing the name is an impl detail that's not too hard 19:11

<vmassol> :) 19:13 <tmortagne> title concept is technical ? 19:13 <vmassol> seeing

communication ;) 13:46 <vmassol> tmortagne: ok 13:46 <vmassol> thanks 13:46 <vmassol> too bad that this concept

if some title is badly displayed 14:05 <vmassol> the alternative is to remove the concept of "works

tick 14:07 <vmassol> to indicate it "works" iwth XE 6.0.1 14:07 <vmassol> but the concept is fuzzy 14

communication ;) 13:46 <vmassol> tmortagne: ok 13:46 <vmassol> thanks 13:46 <vmassol> too bad that this concept

if some title is badly displayed 14:05 <vmassol> the alternative is to remove the concept of "works

tick 14:07 <vmassol> to indicate it "works" iwth XE 6.0.1 14:07 <vmassol> but the concept is fuzzy 14

16:11 <tmortagne> vmassol: my -0 was not about having the concept of syntax in the model but about

16:11 <tmortagne> vmassol: my -0 was not about having the concept of syntax in the model but about