Search: concept
Last modified by Vincent Massol on 2014/10/21
IRC Archive for channel #xwiki
Located in
- Raw document content
18:29 <arkub> has quit 18:47 <mflorea> has quit 18:50 <tekzilla> has quit 18:54 <Chami1> tmortagne: yeah, like "localhost:8080" or "xwiki.org" 18:55 <+tmortagne> Chami1: you need to give more that just that, there is at least user and password and maybe more later so it should be a Configuration object with the URL among other things and not just it 18:55 <tekzilla> has joined #xwiki 18:55 <+tmortagne> anyway ok to give in the constructor 18:56 <+tmortagne> it's a details IMO can always change later 18:56 <Chami1> ok 18:56 <+tmortagne> for now what's important is the general concept of providing an UI element which is working on its own 18:57 <+tmortagne> in the future what would be nice is that all required information to access XWiki are registered in an android account and application use that account to acces connect to XWiki 18:58 <+tmortagne> like you have google account for example 18:59 <+tmortagne> but anyway right now what's important is to make the library working and as complete and clean as possible 19:01 <Chami1> yeah, time is so tight to do all these things. so I have to be more focused on the major features 19:01 <Chami1> :) 19:01 <sburjan> has quit 19:01 <+tmortagne> Chami1: what's the most important is that what you do is the easy to use for an android developer, that should be your main focus when choosing a design path 19:03 <+tmortagne> in this case constructor taking a XWikiConfiguration object is easy enough so it's ok for now 19:04 <+tmortagne> the result does not have to be perfect in all aspects but it should fit the main goal: developer should like to use your library :) 19:04 <+tmortagne> I have to go now 19:05 <Chami1> tmortagne: ok, bye. thank you for informing me 19:52 <qwebirc90155> has joined #xwiki 19:54 <qwebirc90155> Hello All, Im trying to find a way to include default data inside a TextArea Property.
IRC Archive for channel #xwiki
Located in
- Raw document content
CalebJamesDeLisl - (11:58): A concept that I find interesting is sandboxing user script so we don't have to filter out all possible XSS.
IRC Archive for channel #xwiki
Located in
- Raw document content
refreshed=1" />{{/html}}#end{{/velocity cjdelisle - (00:05): there's a proof of concept for meta refresh. BK33 - (00:07): so i wouldnt use something like this?
IRC Archive for channel #xwiki
Located in
- Raw document content
17:35 <vmassol> needs to move classloader in commons though 17:36 <+tmortagne> yep 17:38 <+tmortagne> we could find a way to make include macro a bit less dependent on wiki concept, like some API to get the XDOM of a target resource whatever this resource it and do all the context jingling in events like we do for script macros 17:38 <vmassol> we can also have 2 include macros 17:38 <vmassol> a generic one with less featrures 17:39 <+tmortagne> yep 17:39 <vmassol> and a xwiki one that extends it 17:39 <vmassol> tmortagne: didn't see your message re the macro move.
IRC Archive for channel #xwiki
Located in
- Raw document content
23:44 <@cjdelisle> I got it, spaaaam 23:44 <+sburjan`> ok, so now out lists are becomming spam :( 23:45 <+sburjan`> like it wasn't alreadye nough 23:45 <@cjdelisle> yea, it's because the smtpds are comfigured incorrectly and they relay mail with invalid headers 23:45 <+sburjan`> yeah, open relay 23:46 <+sburjan`> it's odd that they seem legit.. the from and to fields seem legit 23:46 <tekzilla_> has joined #xwiki 23:46 <+sburjan`> you have to look in the source to see it's spam 23:46 <@cjdelisle> sort of but (hopefully) not relaying to the entire world 23:46 <+sburjan`> this is pure damage.. from slow and crowded internet up to electrical power consumed 23:47 <@cjdelisle> if I ran an smtpd, spammers would talk of it only under their breath <evil grin> 23:47 <+sburjan`> :D 23:49 <@cjdelisle> http://www.symantec.com/connect/articles/slow-down-internet-worms-tarpits 23:49 <@cjdelisle> ``the concept of a TCP session not "letting go" could be really distressing to some TCP stacks and operating systems -it's even possible that they may crash'' 23:50 <@sdumitriu> Didn't receive it, gmail has a good filter 23:50 <tekzilla> has quit
IRC Archive for channel #xwiki
Located in
- Raw document content
17:26 <vmassol> JuanDaugherty: you shouldn't use workspaces 17:26 <vmassol> it's been retired as you know 17:26 <vmassol> and we've integrated several of its features in XE 17:26 <vmassol> (and no I haven't worked on the design of workspaces) 17:27 <JuanDaugherty> I meant the concept with the URL I just gave, not jvelociter's project 17:27 <JuanDaugherty> besides it's not being supported, why shouldn't I use it?
IRC Archive for channel #xwiki
Located in
- Raw document content
CalebJamesDeLisl - (20:28): they double sanitized < it seems like there ought to be "smart" escapes which will detect already escaped stuff and skip it. npm - (20:29): the article is good in that it shows how wasteful the entire pattern "concept" is... and the pages of code and bugs it causses...... is replaced by a simple language feature that eliminates the need for contorting yourself into a "pattern" CalebJamesDeLisl - (20:32): I get the idea that patterns are often fads like we had object oriented until people realized that everyone makes incompatible objects.
IRC Archive for channel #xwiki
Located in
- Raw document content
This is called lazy consensus." vmassol - (23:34): this means that you're free to commit stuff but any committer could ask you to revert vmassol - (23:35): i(if it was something not voted) vmassol - (23:35): I tried to mimick what is done on apache lucaa - (23:35): well... yes, but lazy consensus doesn't mean ignoring a vote mail, it means not sending it in the first place vmassol - (23:36): http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus vmassol - (23:36): "Consensus Gauging through Silence vmassol - (23:36): An alternative to voting that is sometimes used to measure the acceptability of something is the concept of http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#LazyConsensus. vmassol - (23:36): Lazy consensus is simply an announcement of 'silence gives assent.'
IRC Archive for channel #xwiki
Located in
- Raw document content
KermitTheFragger left at 19:25 (Remote host closed the connection tsziklay - (19:30): cjdelisle: I'm not sure, I just do not know how to make an xwiki page. my boss has indicated that he wants this "if click then run script" functionality and said xwiki is probably able to support it. tsziklay - (19:31): cjdelisle: basically all I would need is a single page showing proof of concept for this; I do not need anything beyond say, a title, a URL, and a link that runs my python code. cjdelisle - (19:32): Do you have to be able to view the page with the
IRC Archive for channel #xwiki
Located in
