Search: concept

Last modified by Vincent Massol on 2014/10/21

Results 61 - 70 of 100 « previous page next page » Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

IRC Archive for channel #xwiki on 01 July 2014

Located in
Last modified by Vincent Massol on 2014/07/01
Rendered document content
> it's a technical name 19:00 <vmassol> technical concept 19:00 <vmassol> which is fine for a macro 19:00
for the concept ;) 19:10 <vmassol> changing the name is an impl detail that's not too hard 19:11
<vmassol> :) 19:13 <tmortagne> title concept is technical ? 19:13 <vmassol> seeing
Raw document content
> it's a technical name 19:00 <vmassol> technical concept 19:00 <vmassol> which is fine for a macro 19:00
for the concept ;) 19:10 <vmassol> changing the name is an impl detail that's not too hard 19:11
<vmassol> :) 19:13 <tmortagne> title concept is technical ? 19:13 <vmassol> seeing

IRC Archive for channel #xwiki on 01 August 2013

Located in
Last modified by Vincent Massol on 2013/08/01
Rendered document content
16:11 <tmortagne> vmassol: my -0 was not about having the concept of syntax in the model but about
Raw document content
16:11 <tmortagne> vmassol: my -0 was not about having the concept of syntax in the model but about

IRC Archive for channel #xwiki

Located in
Last modified by Vincent Massol on 2012/10/18
Raw document content
> ``the concept of a TCP session not "letting go" could be really distressing to some TCP stacks and

IRC Archive for channel #xwiki

Located in
Last modified by Vincent Massol on 2012/10/18
Raw document content
later 18:56 <Chami1> ok 18:56 <+tmortagne> for now what's important is the general concept of providing

IRC Archive for channel #xwiki

Located in
Last modified by Vincent Massol on 2012/10/18
Rendered document content
it's "xwiki-core specific", no it's ok since we already have multiwiki concept in wiki macro
xwiki concept. But yes, it's already there so it's fine vmassol - (16:37): sdumitriu: still the
Raw document content
it's "xwiki-core specific", no it's ok since we already have multiwiki concept in wiki macro
xwiki concept. But yes, it's already there so it's fine vmassol - (16:37): sdumitriu: still the

IRC Archive for channel #xwiki

Located in
Last modified by Vincent Massol on 2012/10/18
Rendered document content
> yeah. it's a very nice concept 11:02 <jstoldt> just like tide turbines 11:03 <@cjdelisle> Also you have
load calculations tell just how much. 11:05 <jstoldt> well, for me personally the best concept for
Raw document content
> yeah. it's a very nice concept 11:02 <jstoldt> just like tide turbines 11:03 <@cjdelisle> Also you have
load calculations tell just how much. 11:05 <jstoldt> well, for me personally the best concept for

IRC Archive for channel #xwiki

Located in
Last modified by Vincent Massol on 2012/10/18
Rendered document content
"page renamed" event 11:51 <jstoldt> to be honest, i don't like the concept of add new, remove old to
Raw document content
"page renamed" event 11:51 <jstoldt> to be honest, i don't like the concept of add new, remove old to

IRC Archive for channel #xwiki

Located in
Last modified by Vincent Massol on 2012/10/18
Raw document content
the design of workspaces) 17:27 <JuanDaugherty> I meant the concept with the URL I just gave, not

IRC Archive for channel #xwiki

Located in
Last modified by Vincent Massol on 2012/10/18
Rendered document content
proof of concept 11:43 <vmassol> ok good 11:43 <vmassol> thanks 11:46 <pturcotte> has quit 12:11
Raw document content
the administration app) just for the proof of concept 11:43 <vmassol> ok good 11:43 <vmassol> thanks

IRC Archive for channel #xwiki

Located in
Last modified by Vincent Massol on 2012/10/18
Rendered document content
commons sense, when a project contains too much concept you separate it is several like we do all the time
Raw document content
commons sense, when a project contains too much concept you separate it is several like we do all the time
RSS feed for search on [concept]
Tags:
Created by Admin on 2010/05/03

Get Connected