Search: concept

Last modified by Vincent Massol on 2014/10/21

Results 1 - 10 of 50 next page » Page 1 2 3 4 5

XWiki Forms & URL Mappings

Located in
Last modified by Philipp Roessler on 2020/01/28
Rendered document content
. Example to illustrate formentioned concepts. Ex: Ajax request to add and init an object
Objects
comment : The combination of *actions* (like <tt>save</tt>) and *request parameters* (like <tt>xredirect</tt>) obviously is a very powerful means to work with XWiki documents. Is there any documentation on that? Where do these concepts belong to in the first place, Struts, XWiki, Velocity or another technology?
Raw document content
", or "1" {table} 1.1 Sample use cases TBD. Example to illustrate formentioned concepts. Ex: Ajax

IRC Archive for channel #xwiki on 10 January 2012

Located in
Last modified by Vincent Massol on 2012/10/18
Raw document content
<+tmortagne> that page could be aware of multiwiki concept, where is the API which require multiwiki
the solution is to filter in that page I'm asking where the multiwiki concept is really required 14:42
> linckchecker store itself can stay in commons if it provide a concept of namespace 14:56 <vmassol> well if we

IRC Archive for channel #xwiki

Located in
Last modified by Vincent Massol on 2012/10/18
Rendered document content
silly to let a user sign something without knowing it. cjdelisle - (12:07): takes away the concept of
Raw document content
silly to let a user sign something without knowing it. cjdelisle - (12:07): takes away the concept of

IRC Archive for channel #xwiki

Located in
Last modified by Vincent Massol on 2012/10/18
Rendered document content
- (14:18): lucaa: it is, the concept is the same vmassol - (14:18): ask ciprian I'm sure he'll tell you he copied the concept from the current xwiki sas ologo tmortagne - (14:18): IMO 15 is way too close
one, the concept is different vmassol - (14:19): very different vmassol - (14:19): in our case it
Raw document content
- (14:18): lucaa: it is, the concept is the same vmassol - (14:18): ask ciprian I'm sure he'll tell you he copied the concept from the current xwiki sas ologo tmortagne - (14:18): IMO 15 is way too close
one, the concept is different vmassol - (14:19): very different vmassol - (14:19): in our case it

IRC Archive for channel #xwiki

Located in
Last modified by Vincent Massol on 2012/10/18
Rendered document content
have some proof of concept implementation of signed scripts abusenius - (00:19): https://svn.xwiki.org
Raw document content
have some proof of concept implementation of signed scripts abusenius - (00:19): https://svn.xwiki.org

IRC Archive for channel #xwiki on 28 September 2012

Located in
Last modified by Vincent Massol on 2012/10/18
Rendered document content
WYSIWYG server module in two 10:47 <+tmortagne> one without any context concept and one with it 10:47
Raw document content
WYSIWYG server module in two 10:47 <+tmortagne> one without any context concept and one with it 10:47

IRC Archive for channel #xwiki

Located in
Last modified by Vincent Massol on 2012/10/18
Rendered document content
:29): [Vincent Massol] a hint represents a concept xwiki-bridge - (14:30): [Vincent Massol] not an impl xwiki-bridge - (14:30): [Vincent Massol] "scribo" is not a concept xwiki-bridge - (14:30): [tmortagne] Vincent Massol: what is a concept ? xwiki-bridge - (14:30): [Vincent Massol] tmortagne: for ex
Raw document content
:29): [Vincent Massol] a hint represents a concept xwiki-bridge - (14:30): [Vincent Massol] not an impl xwiki-bridge - (14:30): [Vincent Massol] "scribo" is not a concept xwiki-bridge - (14:30): [tmortagne] Vincent Massol: what is a concept ? xwiki-bridge - (14:30): [Vincent Massol] tmortagne: for ex

IRC Archive for channel #xwiki

Located in
Last modified by Vincent Massol on 2012/10/18
Rendered document content
it's "xwiki-core specific", no it's ok since we already have multiwiki concept in wiki macro
xwiki concept. But yes, it's already there so it's fine vmassol - (16:37): sdumitriu: still the
Raw document content
it's "xwiki-core specific", no it's ok since we already have multiwiki concept in wiki macro
xwiki concept. But yes, it's already there so it's fine vmassol - (16:37): sdumitriu: still the

IRC Archive for channel #xwiki

Located in
Last modified by Vincent Massol on 2012/10/18
Rendered document content
now is that the existing dashboard proof of concept doesn't work anymore lucaa - (15:52): and all it
Raw document content
): because what happens right now is that the existing dashboard proof of concept doesn't work anymore lucaa
, sure. I was just pleasantly surprised by the concept of special cases :) tmortagne - (16:02): lucaa

IRC Archive for channel #xwiki

Located in
Last modified by Vincent Massol on 2012/10/18
Rendered document content
): which shouldn't be aware of that CalebJamesDeLisl - (11:35): -1 to the concept of blocking script in
Raw document content
): which shouldn't be aware of that CalebJamesDeLisl - (11:35): -1 to the concept of blocking script in
{ CalebJamesDeLisl - (12:26): Since it looks like we're going to have to add the concept of "can nest", "cannot nest
an internal component tmortagne - (17:28): (O:-)) CalebJamesDeLisl - (17:29): There's a concept of
next page » Page 1 2 3 4 5
RSS feed for search on [concept]

Get Connected