Search: concept

silly to let a user sign something without knowing it. cjdelisle - (12:07): takes away the concept of

silly to let a user sign something without knowing it. cjdelisle - (12:07): takes away the concept of

- (14:18): lucaa: it is, the concept is the same vmassol - (14:18): ask ciprian I'm sure he'll tell you he copied the concept from the current xwiki sas ologo tmortagne - (14:18): IMO 15 is way too close

one, the concept is different vmassol - (14:19): very different vmassol - (14:19): in our case it

- (14:18): lucaa: it is, the concept is the same vmassol - (14:18): ask ciprian I'm sure he'll tell you he copied the concept from the current xwiki sas ologo tmortagne - (14:18): IMO 15 is way too close

one, the concept is different vmassol - (14:19): very different vmassol - (14:19): in our case it

have some proof of concept implementation of signed scripts abusenius - (00:19): https://svn.xwiki.org

have some proof of concept implementation of signed scripts abusenius - (00:19): https://svn.xwiki.org

WYSIWYG server module in two 10:47 <+tmortagne> one without any context concept and one with it 10:47

WYSIWYG server module in two 10:47 <+tmortagne> one without any context concept and one with it 10:47

:29): [Vincent Massol] a hint represents a concept xwiki-bridge - (14:30): [Vincent Massol] not an impl xwiki-bridge - (14:30): [Vincent Massol] "scribo" is not a concept xwiki-bridge - (14:30): [tmortagne] Vincent Massol: what is a concept ? xwiki-bridge - (14:30): [Vincent Massol] tmortagne: for ex

:29): [Vincent Massol] a hint represents a concept xwiki-bridge - (14:30): [Vincent Massol] not an impl xwiki-bridge - (14:30): [Vincent Massol] "scribo" is not a concept xwiki-bridge - (14:30): [tmortagne] Vincent Massol: what is a concept ? xwiki-bridge - (14:30): [Vincent Massol] tmortagne: for ex

it's "xwiki-core specific", no it's ok since we already have multiwiki concept in wiki macro

xwiki concept. But yes, it's already there so it's fine vmassol - (16:37): sdumitriu: still the

it's "xwiki-core specific", no it's ok since we already have multiwiki concept in wiki macro

xwiki concept. But yes, it's already there so it's fine vmassol - (16:37): sdumitriu: still the

now is that the existing dashboard proof of concept doesn't work anymore lucaa - (15:52): and all it

): because what happens right now is that the existing dashboard proof of concept doesn't work anymore lucaa

, sure. I was just pleasantly surprised by the concept of special cases :) tmortagne - (16:02): lucaa

): which shouldn't be aware of that CalebJamesDeLisl - (11:35): -1 to the concept of blocking script in

): which shouldn't be aware of that CalebJamesDeLisl - (11:35): -1 to the concept of blocking script in

{ CalebJamesDeLisl - (12:26): Since it looks like we're going to have to add the concept of "can nest", "cannot nest

an internal component tmortagne - (17:28): (O:-)) CalebJamesDeLisl - (17:29): There's a concept of

"page renamed" event 11:51 <jstoldt> to be honest, i don't like the concept of add new, remove old to

"page renamed" event 11:51 <jstoldt> to be honest, i don't like the concept of add new, remove old to

<jstoldt> proof of concept? 10:16 <@cjdelisle> Because mine doesn't rely on asking verisign who owns a

<jstoldt> proof of concept? 10:16 <@cjdelisle> Because mine doesn't rely on asking verisign who owns a