Search: concept

explication what it is 09:31 <Pbas> perhaps a java concept? 09:32 <Pbas> or xwiki concept? 09:32 <tmortagne> it's the XWiki context as it's name indicate so yes a XWiki concept :) 09:32 <tmortagne> it contains

explication what it is 09:31 <Pbas> perhaps a java concept? 09:32 <Pbas> or xwiki concept? 09:32 <tmortagne> it's the XWiki context as it's name indicate so yes a XWiki concept :) 09:32 <tmortagne> it contains

page… seems we have blow up some concept too fast ! 10:20 <vmassol> IMO that's a mistake, we shouldn't be able to administer a non existing page 10:20 <vmassol> I don't see any issue of concept though 10

page… seems we have blow up some concept too fast ! 10:20 <vmassol> IMO that's a mistake, we shouldn't be able to administer a non existing page 10:20 <vmassol> I don't see any issue of concept though 10

:34 <cjd> has quit 03:38 <daemoen> did 7.* replace the concept of spaces with 'subwikis' ? I can't

:34 <cjd> has quit 03:38 <daemoen> did 7.* replace the concept of spaces with 'subwikis' ? I can't

<tmortagne> TranslationBundle API have the concept of priority but all wiki based bundle provide the same

> (10:58:47 AM) tmortagne: TranslationBundle API have the concept of priority but all wiki based bundle

<tmortagne> TranslationBundle API have the concept of priority but all wiki based bundle provide the same

> (10:58:47 AM) tmortagne: TranslationBundle API have the concept of priority but all wiki based bundle

about something.. Can I still use spaces in 7.4? I actually could use the concept. 13:46 <vmassol

defeats the purpose of space as a more top level context container. Foswiki also had the webs concept for

confuse everyone else 14:11 <vmassol> (since you'd need to explain the concept of spaces and how it's

about something.. Can I still use spaces in 7.4? I actually could use the concept. 13:46 <vmassol

defeats the purpose of space as a more top level context container. Foswiki also had the webs concept for

confuse everyone else 14:11 <vmassol> (since you'd need to explain the concept of spaces and how it's

<+tmortagne> that page could be aware of multiwiki concept, where is the API which require multiwiki

the solution is to filter in that page I'm asking where the multiwiki concept is really required 14:42

> linckchecker store itself can stay in commons if it provide a concept of namespace 14:56 <vmassol> well if we

log 12:16 <altker1281> I think Foswiki does a bit better job with their 'Breadcrumb' concept. Their

concept that would help 12:26 <tmortagne> vmassol: I guess the build is not always done in the exact same

concept as xwiki, no? 12:28 <altker1281> vmassol: Personally, I think it should appear slightly bigger

log 12:16 <altker1281> I think Foswiki does a bit better job with their 'Breadcrumb' concept. Their

concept that would help 12:26 <tmortagne> vmassol: I guess the build is not always done in the exact same

concept as xwiki, no? 12:28 <altker1281> vmassol: Personally, I think it should appear slightly bigger

something btw 11:48 <vmassol> (good morning) 11:48 <gdelhumeau> hi 11:48 <vmassol> if we replace the concept

something btw 11:48 <vmassol> (good morning) 11:48 <gdelhumeau> hi 11:48 <vmassol> if we replace the concept

silly to let a user sign something without knowing it. cjdelisle - (12:07): takes away the concept of

silly to let a user sign something without knowing it. cjdelisle - (12:07): takes away the concept of

communication ;) 13:46 <vmassol> tmortagne: ok 13:46 <vmassol> thanks 13:46 <vmassol> too bad that this concept

if some title is badly displayed 14:05 <vmassol> the alternative is to remove the concept of "works

tick 14:07 <vmassol> to indicate it "works" iwth XE 6.0.1 14:07 <vmassol> but the concept is fuzzy 14

communication ;) 13:46 <vmassol> tmortagne: ok 13:46 <vmassol> thanks 13:46 <vmassol> too bad that this concept

if some title is badly displayed 14:05 <vmassol> the alternative is to remove the concept of "works

tick 14:07 <vmassol> to indicate it "works" iwth XE 6.0.1 14:07 <vmassol> but the concept is fuzzy 14