Search: concept

<+tmortagne> that page could be aware of multiwiki concept, where is the API which require multiwiki

the solution is to filter in that page I'm asking where the multiwiki concept is really required 14:42

> linckchecker store itself can stay in commons if it provide a concept of namespace 14:56 <vmassol> well if we

silly to let a user sign something without knowing it. cjdelisle - (12:07): takes away the concept of

silly to let a user sign something without knowing it. cjdelisle - (12:07): takes away the concept of

volumes of data. Currently the concept is ongoing translation. Reimport of the main language (english

translation application. The concept seems to work by application version. We need to verity

concurrent access and faster handling of big volumes of data. Currently the concept is ongoing translation

on launchpad.net there is a quite extensively developed translation application. The concept seems to work

- (14:18): lucaa: it is, the concept is the same vmassol - (14:18): ask ciprian I'm sure he'll tell you he copied the concept from the current xwiki sas ologo tmortagne - (14:18): IMO 15 is way too close

one, the concept is different vmassol - (14:19): very different vmassol - (14:19): in our case it

- (14:18): lucaa: it is, the concept is the same vmassol - (14:18): ask ciprian I'm sure he'll tell you he copied the concept from the current xwiki sas ologo tmortagne - (14:18): IMO 15 is way too close

one, the concept is different vmassol - (14:19): very different vmassol - (14:19): in our case it

have some proof of concept implementation of signed scripts abusenius - (00:19): https://svn.xwiki.org

have some proof of concept implementation of signed scripts abusenius - (00:19): https://svn.xwiki.org

WYSIWYG server module in two 10:47 <+tmortagne> one without any context concept and one with it 10:47

WYSIWYG server module in two 10:47 <+tmortagne> one without any context concept and one with it 10:47

:29): [Vincent Massol] a hint represents a concept xwiki-bridge - (14:30): [Vincent Massol] not an impl xwiki-bridge - (14:30): [Vincent Massol] "scribo" is not a concept xwiki-bridge - (14:30): [tmortagne] Vincent Massol: what is a concept ? xwiki-bridge - (14:30): [Vincent Massol] tmortagne: for ex

:29): [Vincent Massol] a hint represents a concept xwiki-bridge - (14:30): [Vincent Massol] not an impl xwiki-bridge - (14:30): [Vincent Massol] "scribo" is not a concept xwiki-bridge - (14:30): [tmortagne] Vincent Massol: what is a concept ? xwiki-bridge - (14:30): [Vincent Massol] tmortagne: for ex

it's "xwiki-core specific", no it's ok since we already have multiwiki concept in wiki macro

xwiki concept. But yes, it's already there so it's fine vmassol - (16:37): sdumitriu: still the

it's "xwiki-core specific", no it's ok since we already have multiwiki concept in wiki macro

xwiki concept. But yes, it's already there so it's fine vmassol - (16:37): sdumitriu: still the

now is that the existing dashboard proof of concept doesn't work anymore lucaa - (15:52): and all it

): because what happens right now is that the existing dashboard proof of concept doesn't work anymore lucaa

, sure. I was just pleasantly surprised by the concept of special cases :) tmortagne - (16:02): lucaa

): which shouldn't be aware of that CalebJamesDeLisl - (11:35): -1 to the concept of blocking script in

): which shouldn't be aware of that CalebJamesDeLisl - (11:35): -1 to the concept of blocking script in

{ CalebJamesDeLisl - (12:26): Since it looks like we're going to have to add the concept of "can nest", "cannot nest

an internal component tmortagne - (17:28): (O:-)) CalebJamesDeLisl - (17:29): There's a concept of